Download Navy Budget PPBE System...
NAVY PPBE PROCESS 2010 Department of the Navy Human Resources Conference April 28th, 2010
Captain Drew Flavell - Office of the Chief of the Navy Reserve Department of the Navy
Today’s Discussion – The PPBE Process Captain Drew Flavell - [emailprotected]
• PPBE is DoD’s resource allocation process • Planning establishes strategic priorities and capabilities required to achieve the strategy • Programming applies resources to programs that provide the capabilities required to achieve the strategic priorities • Budgeting properly prices the programs, develops justification and an execution plan • Execution performs the approved plan
• Constrained resources drive the process • Successively, within Navy & USMC, to DON, to OSD and to OMB • Must know requirements, and priorities among them • Must achieve both program and TOA balance Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 2
Department of the Navy
2
The Federal Budget Over the Long Run $ in B 6000
5000
4000
Net Interest
Welfare & Other Services Medicare
3000
2000
Other Retirement & Disability
Social Security Medicaid
1000
Defense
Other Discretionary
0 1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
… DoD competes for $$ Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 3
Department of the Navy
3
Combatant Commanders
SECDEF
Robert Gates
CJCS
VCJCS
ADM Mullen
Gen Cartwright
SOUTHCOM
PACOM
EUCOM
CENTCOM
GEN Fraser
ADM Keating
ADM Stavridis
GEN Petraeus
JFCOM
NORTHCOM
SOCOM
STRATCOM
GEN Mattis
GEN Renuart
ADM Olson
GEN Chilton
AFRICOM
AFRICOM
GEN Navy PPBE Process Ward - HR Conference Slide 4
TRANSCOM GEN McNabb
Department of the Navy
4
Navy Secretariat Organization Secretary of the Navy
DoN Chief Information Officer
Undersecretary of the Navy
Judge Advocate General of the Navy
Chief of Information
Chief of Legislative Affairs
Auditor General Naval Inspector General
Assistant for Administration*
Director Program Appraisal
Director Small & Disadv Bus. Utilization
Asst Secretary Of the Navy (Research, Dev & Acq)
Asst Secretary Of the Navy (Manpower & Resv Affairs)
Chief of Naval Research
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Asst Secretary Of the Navy (Fin Mgmt & Comptroller)
Chief of Naval Operations Slide 5
Asst Secretary Of the Navy (Installations & Environment)
General Counsel of the Dept of the Navy
Commandant of the Marine Corps Department of the Navy
5
The DoN Secretariat Secretary of the Navy Honorable Ray Mabus AG R. Leach
OLA RADM Miller
Under Secretary of the Navy Honorable Robert Work
GC
SecNav Pers Staff
IG VADM Winns
RMDL Moynihan
OPA Jo. Decker
AAUSN E. Roberson
DUSN for Departmental Plans, Policy, Oversight, and Integration Bill Natter
DUSN for Business Enterprise Operations and Transformation Eric Fanning
JAG VADM MacDonald Dir NCIS Thomas Betro
GC Anne Brennan (Acting)
CHINFO
CNR RADM Carr
DONCIO Robert Carey
ASN RD&A
ASN-FM&C
ASN-I&E
Sean Stackley
John McNair (Acting)
Roger Natsuhara
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 6
ASN-M&RA Juan Garcia
(Acting)
Department of the Navy
6
CNO
OPNAV Chief of Navy Reserve
VADM Debbink
ADM Roughead
MCPON MCPON(SS/SW) West
ADM Greenert
QDR
NGEN
DNS
RADM Goodwin
RADM Burke
Chief of Chaplains
Dir, Test & Evaluation
RADM Burt
RDML Dunaway
VADM Locklear
N4
N2/N6
N1 VADM Ferguson
ADM Donald
VCNO
Surgeon General
VADM Robinson
Dir. Nuclear Propulsion
VADM Loose
VADM Dorsett
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 7
N3/N5 VADM Crowder
N8 VADM McCullough
Department of the Navy
7
Joint Military Community (JMC) – Reporting Relationships President of the United States
Other Defense Agencies
Secretary of Defense
CJCS JCS Joint Staff
Delegated Oversight Responsibility
Functional and Geographic Combatant Commanders
Military Departments/Services
Component Commands
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 8
Department of the Navy
8
Linking to External Partners: OSD and JCS DJS
J1
J2
J3 J5
J4
J6
J7 J8
Capability (JCS)
DNS
N1
N2
N3 N5
N4
N6
N8
Specificity (OPNAV)
OPA
ASN (M&RA)
ASN (RD&A)
ASN (I&E)
ASN (RD&A)
ASN (RD&A)
DON CIO
ASN (FM&C)
DIR ADMIN & MGMT
USD (Pers & Red)
USD (I)
USD (P)
USD (AT&L)
ASD (NII/CIO)
USD (AT&L) USD (Comp/ CFO)
Stability (SECNAV)
Affordability (OSD)
CAPE Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 9
Department of the Navy
9
Navy Enterprise INDIVIDUAL WARFARE ENTERPRISES PROVIDERS & ENABLERS
NAE
SWE
USE
NNFE
Demand Signals
NECC
CNO
REQUIREMENTS
MPT&E AT&L
Installs Health Care S&T
OUTPUT = READINESS AT COST
PRODUCTIVITY DRIVERS: – Priorities – Behavioral Changes – Single Processes/ Owners Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 10
USFF/ VCNO/ ASN (RDA)
N8/ ASN (FMB)
PROVIDERS
RESOURCES
– Common Metrics – Integrated Capabilities – Transparency of Information Department of the Navy
10
PPBE Overlapping ‘Cycles’ POM10 FY10 PB
POM: Program Objective Memorandum PB: President’s Budget PR: Program Review
Programming Budgeting
Execution
Planning PR11 FY11 PB
Programming Budgeting
Execution • Perform the plan
Planning
POM12 FY12 PB
• Develop the strategy • Capability assessment
JAN 08
JAN 09
Programming • Allocate resources Budgeting • Fiscal constraints • Detail & accuracy • Program balance • Justification • Develop the plan
JAN 10
JAN 11
Today Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 11
Department of the Navy
11
PPBE Products In a Notional POM Cycle * POM On-year
Planning
Programming
SecDef Guidance for the Development of the Force (GDF)
SecDef Joint Programming Guidance
Navy Strategic Plan (NSP)
CNO Guidance
Navy Capability Plans CNO Investment Strategy
Navy POM USMC POM
Budgeting Execution DON Budget Submits
Performance Plan
Budget Funds Allocation Estimate Submission SecDef Supplemental Program/Budget Request Decisions President’s Budget
Reprogramming Request
DON POM Appropriation & Authorization * PR (off-year) products discussed in Programming module Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 12
Department of the Navy
12
PPBE Timeframes To Congress Spring 2010
POM12 (‘On Year’) Every Year
06 07 08 09 10
11
Execution
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Programming
Planning
• • •
•
Five Years Defense Plan (FYDP) • Five-year period for resource allocation Planning years • Horizon for planning force structure & recapitalization • Anticipate FYDP resource implications (e.g. advanced procurement) Budget year • Congress review, authorization and appropriation Execution years • 1-10 prior years, depending on type of appropriation
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 13
Department of the Navy
13
POM-12 Timeline
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 14
Department of the Navy
14
PPBE Focus of the decision
Aircraft
Programming Program view
Ships
Battlespace Awareness
Base Support
Capabilities view
Manpower
Spare Parts
Planning
Fuel
Communications
RDTEN
Medical
Procurement
Intelligence
Property Repair
Space
Construction
Facilities
Depot Maintenance
Force Application Force Support
Budgeting Commodities/Appropriations view
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 15
Department of the Navy
15
Achieving Resource Balance
• The right level of resources
Manpower
• The right program prioritization • The right amount of risk • The right program tradeoffs
Integration for Resource Balance
Readiness
Investment
…among and between MANPOWER, INVESTMENTS, and READINESS Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 16
Department of the Navy
16
PPBE - (Planning)
POM: Program Objective Memorandum PB: President’s Budget
POM12 FY12 PB
Planning • Develop the strategy • Capability assessment
Programming Budgeting • Allocate resources • Fiscal constraints • Detail & accuracy • Program balance • Justification • Develop the plan
Execution • Perform the plan
• Strategy development - N3/N5 (N51) • Develop/refine military & business strategies
• Capabilities assessment - N8 (N81) • Identify and balance the warfighting & support capabilities needed to achieve the strategy JAN 09 Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
JAN 10 Slide 17
JAN 11
JAN 12 Department of the Navy
17
N81: Strategic Assessment N81/QDR Director Assessments
N810 Joint Requirements & Acquisition
N81F* FORCEnet
N811 Studies, Resources & Costing
N812 Warfighting Assessment
N81G* Sea Shaping
N814 Warfighting Support Analysis
N81M* Sea Basing
N81P* Sea Shield
N816 Campaign Analysis
N81T* Sea Strike
* N-81 Pillar Leads
• Determination of warfare requirements, allocation of resources, program planning, and study efforts Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 18
Department of the Navy
18
Maritime Strategy • The Navy is setting out a series of strategic plans to guide its way ahead in the 21st century. • The Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower (a.k.a. CS21) is one element of a larger four-part structure that includes: • Vision sets the ends. The Navy’s vision is Sea Power 21. • Strategy is the ways and means to achieve the ends set forth in the vision. The new Maritime Strategy will fill this role. • Operations, as addressed in the Naval Operations Concept, comprise the way resources are used and applied by the warfighter • Resources are finite & the Navy Strategic Plan will establish CNO priorities and risk guidance for use by programmers in the development of the budget submission Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 19
Department of the Navy
19
Navy Planning: Assessing Capability
POM 12 PB 12
Planning
Programming
Budgeting Execution
JAN 09
JAN 10
JAN 11
JAN 12
CNO Guidance Navy Strategic Plan Guidance for Development of the Force Campaign Analysis Baseline Front End Assessment (N81) Integrated Capability Plan (N81) Warfighting Capability Plan (N81) Integrated Readiness Capability Assessment (N4) Integrated Sponsor Capability Plans (N1 & N6) Integrated Infrastructure Requirements (N4/CNI) Integrated Program Assessment (N81 April) CNO Investment Strategy (N802) CNO Approved Budget to FMB (May) Budget Estimate Submission to OSD (July) JUL 09
SEP
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 20
NOV
JAN 10
MAR Department of the Navy
20
PPBE Programming
POM: Program Objectives Memorandum PB: President’s Budget PR: Program Review
Planning • Develop the strategy • Capability assessment
Programming
Budgeting • Allocate resources • Fiscal constraints • Detail & accuracy • Program balance • Justification • Develop the plan
Execution • Perform the plan
• Program development • Assign resources to programs, to meet capabilities • Apply resource constraints to achieve fiscal balance
• Program review (not PR) • Balance across programs to optimize effectiveness JAN Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
JAN Slide 21
JAN
JAN Department of the Navy
21
Resource Programming • Allocation of future resources • ‘buy’ programs that provide capabilities from Planning Phase • Allocate in each year over the FYDP
• Constraints are imposed • • • •
‘Topline’ TOA limits Many participants have competing requirements Guidance from ‘higher authority’ (Navy, DOD, OMB, Congress) Fact-of-life (e.g. basing), ability to execute
• Iterative processes, within Navy and within DOD, to achieve program balance • Program development and recommendation • Program review (not to be confused with PR), adjustment and decision
• Approved ‘program’ is starting point for budget Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 22
Department of the Navy
22
‘Resource’ in Programming • The commodity that is allocated in programming • In each FY over the FYDP • Commodities can be freely exchanged within a FY • Each has an established/approved ‘price’
• Three types of resources • Quantities: Equipment procured during a FY • End strength: Manpower planned at the end of a FY • $$$: For all other programs
Total F/A-18 Resources (for one FY) Qty 3 $/each $75,000K Subtotal $225,000K Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Endstrength 25 $/each $120K Subtotal $3,000K
Slide 23
Flt Hours 3,000 $/hour $5,000 Subtotal $15,000K
$243,000K Department of the Navy
23
Resource Integration (N80) Integration for Resource Balance
Dir, Programming N80
Program Development • Support balanced investment (warfighting) requirements
Dep Director
• Monitor programs throughout Head, Program Planning and Development Readiness
Head, POM Strategy, R3B
Sea Shield
POM Strategy MPT&E
Sea Strike
FORCEnet
Sea Shaping
Sea Basing
Database Mgmt
N80 “Pillar Leads”
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 24
• R3B Secretariat/Issue Coord • CNO Investment Strategy
• Develop POM guidance, controls, timelines • Emergent OSD, Joint, Fleet, USMC Requirements Department of the Navy
24
Manpower, Personnel, Training & Education (N1)
Manpower
N1 Manpower, Personnel, Education & Training Chief of Naval Personnel N10 MPN Financial Management
N12 Total Force Programming Manpower & Information Resources Management
N11 Civilian Community Management
N13 Military Personnel Plans & Policy N16 Chief Information Officer MPT&E Information Management
• Provide the right person in the right place at the right time • Strive to satisfy personal goals and improve their quality of life • Provide meaningful and rewarding career opportunities, promote and retain the best • Ensure fair and equitable treatment of all hands, by all hands, at all times Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 25
Department of the Navy
25
Readiness & Logistics (N4) Readiness N4 Fleet Readiness & Logistics N41 Supply, Ordnance & Logistics Operations
N42 Strategic Mobility & Combat Logistics
N40 Logistics, Planning & Innovation
N43 Fleet Readiness
N45 Environmental Protection & Readiness
N46 Ashore Readiness
• Provide relevant policy, resources, structures and mechanisms to meet leadership defined readiness requirements of Navy operating forces and their associated shore installations • Enable a responsive, adaptive and efficient logistics support structure that facilitates that readiness and supports the integration of Naval forces into the joint force Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 26
Department of the Navy
26
Investments (N8F, N8(x))
Investment
Dir, Warfare Integration N8F Dep Director
Warfare Integration (N6F/N83)
Oceanographer /Navigator of the Navy (N84)
Expeditionary Warfare (N85)
Surface Warfare (N86)
Submarine Warfare (N87)
Air Warfare (N88)
Special Programs (N89)
• CNO’s principal advisor for warfare capability requirements and integration • Conduct warfighting analysis and programming to support PPBE • Fleet’s OPNAV focal point for warfighting & joint requirements Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 27
Department of the Navy
27
Resource Sponsor • Responsible for an identifiable group of resources constituting certain warfare or supporting tasks • Interrelated programs or parts of programs in several mission areas • Ensuring an effective and balanced program within assigned fiscal controls • Assisting during internal-Navy budget reviews in order to maintain a balanced program CNO
SECNAV: AAUSN
Manpower
DNS
Readiness
Investment
N8(0)
CNIC
SYSCOMS
COMUSFFC
Other Ech 2
Wears the “hat” Process Coordinator Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 28
Department of the Navy
28
Resource Sponsor Actions Programmatic options to “fix” disconnects • Fund
Requires resources
• Restructure
Adjust program’s required results
• Reengineer
Revise processes to use fewer resources
There is a non programmatic option…accept the risk Most often, accepting risk involves delaying funding or assuming the problem can be fixed in execution Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 29
Department of the Navy
29
Programming Process
Most Dear
Funded
New Requirements
RS Unfundeds
Unfundeds
MostDear Dear Most Most Dear
FY12 Most Dear FY09 FY09 New Funded FY12/17 FY09 NewFunded Funded New Content New New Funded Funded Content Content Content
Least Dear Content
Most Dear Most Dear FY12/17 FY06/07 Existing Funded Funded Content Content Least Dear Dear Least
Least Dear Least Dear Least Dear Least Dear
Unfundeds (Risk) Offsets
• Adjust program content by moving resources from lower priority content to content of higher priority • In each successive activity, the services adjust the content of the FYDP based on new or changing requirements • Low priority programs gave way to fund higher priority programs Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 30
Department of the Navy
30
Sources of Offsets
• In general, there are four sources of offsets • Reducing or delaying investments • Cutting RDT&E funds, delaying modernization, stretching procurement
• Reducing/accepting risk in readiness • Cutting operational and formal skills training budgets, eliminating forward basing
• Divesting forces • Planes, ships, readiness, people
• Reducing infrastructure • Base support, tech refresh, ranges and minor facilities
•
Some will argue for a fifth source: efficiencies
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 31
Department of the Navy
31
Programming - Fiscal Guidance DoD
DoN
Air Force $143B
USN N4 $27B
USN $120B
DoN $148B
Army $139B
N6 $5B
N1 $30B N8F $54B
Other $81B
USMC $25B SRB $2B
Other $4B
• OSD issues Service TOA controls across the FYDP • SECNAV approves DoN ‘Blue – Green’ split • N8 distributes Resource Sponsor shares for SPP development **Numbers may not add due to rounding to nearest $Billion. Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 32
Department of the Navy
32
Sponsor Program Proposal Many Inputs, Two Outputs Congress Actions
Fiscal Guidance
N80 POM/PR WARNORD PLANORD FRAGORD(s)
Allocate across FYDP
CNO ‘Path Ahead’
CCIPs
• Endstrength • Investment • Readiness, support, etc. TOA
Make recommendations
Fact of Life Unfundeds
• Database issue details • Briefing to BOD
N8 Program Guidance
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Each Sponsor has an internal process to: Explore options • Capabilities balance • Program balance • Resource balance
N81 Invest Strategy
COCOM IPLs
FY09 FY11
Slide 33
1 . . . . p
Priority 1 . . . . w
….
FY15
Core Issues (Funded) FY09 FY11
….
FY15
Above Core Issues (Unfunded)
SPP Briefing
Department of the Navy
33
POM/PR ‘Endgame’ Iterative, Fast-Paced ‘End Game’
Resource Sponsors submit SPPs Integrate SPPs (N8) Pre T-POM Assessment (N8 with USMC) Revise SPPs and build T-POM (N8) CNO approve Navy POM
NOV
JAN
MAR
MAY
JUL
AUG
• N8-led ‘process’ to balance the Navy POM • N80 compiles SPPs to create the Tentative-POM (T-POM) • N81 assesses degree the T-POM achieves the Investment Strategy • N80 assesses for resource and program balance across the FYDP, and compliance with other guidance
• R3B/BoD reviews the T-POM • Identify guidance ‘busts’, recommend options to CNO
• CNO involved early and often • CNO Guidance provides adjusted guidance to optimize T-POM balance Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 34
Department of the Navy
34
Program Review Concurrent with Budget
PR12 FY12 PB
Planning
Programming
Budgeting Execution
JAN 09
JAN 10
JAN 11
JAN 12
POM to BSOs POM to OSD OSD/CAPE POM Issues DoD Senior Level Review (SLRG, DAWG) DepSecDef Resource Management Decisions BSO Budget submits FMB review and markup SecNav budget decisions BSOs & FMB develop BES Budget Estimate Submission to OSD/C OSD/C review and Resource Mgmt Decisions Major Budget Issues DepSecDef decisions Develop & submit President’s Budget (Feb 1) MAY Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
JUL Slide 35
SEP
NOV
JAN Department of the Navy
35
OSD Program Review Process OSD Issue Team - Analysis - Programmatics - Alternatives - Courses of Action
Briefing and/or Paper
RMD
SLRG/DAWG SLRG/DAWG
OSD Issue Team (w/ DoN member(s))
Pre SLRG or DAWG
(SECDEF) SECNAV/CNO
(DEPSECDEF)
attends briefings
3-Star
Out-of-Court
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
CAPE/ 3-Star Meeting N8 Attends Issue Papers or Briefing
CAPE/ N8/N80 negotiate issues
Slide 36
Courses of Action
Courses of Action
CAPE Comptroller VCJCS
SECDEF
Courses of Action
Department of the Navy
36
PPBE: Budgeting
Planning Programming
POM10 FY10 PB
Budgeting
Execution • Program balance • Detail & accuracy • Fiscal constraints • Performing as appropriated • Prior year execution • Justification and defense
PR11 FY11PB
Planning
Programming Budgeting Execution
POM12 FY12 PB
Planning
POM: PR: PB:
Program Objectives Memorandum Program Review President’s Budget
JAN 08 Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
JAN 09 Slide 37
Programming Budgeting JAN10
JAN11 Department of the Navy
37
Applying Fiscal Granularity
Asst Secretary of the Navy (Financial Mgmt & Comptroller)
Dir, Fiscal Mgmt FMB/N82 FMBB/N82B: Asso. Director
Operations Division FMB1/N821
Investment & Development Division FMB2/N822
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 38
Program/ Budget Coord Division FMB3/N823
FMBE Asst for Appropriation Matters
Civ Resources & Business Affairs Division FMB4/N824
Budget Policy & Procedures Division FMB5/N825
Department of the Navy
38
Appropriation Sponsor • The senior executive in the DON responsible for • Supervisory control and broad decision-making authority over a designated appropriation • Assisting in solving funding deficiencies during budget formulation • Representing Navy before Congress -
preparing and reviewing witness statements responding to questions and briefing Congressional members or staff reviewing Committee reports and for preparing consolidated appeals
• Recommending the reprogramming of funds within the appropriation during budget execution CNO DNS
Manpower
Readiness
Wears the “hat”
Investment
FMB/N82
CNIC
SYSCOMS COMUSFFC
Other Ech 2
Process Coordinator
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 39
Department of the Navy
39
Budget Submitting Office • A DON office responsible for • Preparation, compilation, and submission of budget estimates and supporting materials • Delivering prescribed exhibits and ensuring that subordinate offices submit materials on time • Ensuring submissions are consistent with DON Review and OSD/OMB budget decisions • During budget execution, ensuring budget plans are accomplished within available funding CNO
DNS
Manpower
Readiness
Investment
FMB
CNIC
SYSCOMS
COMUSFFC
Other Ech 2
Wears the “hat” Process Coordinator Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 40
Department of the Navy
40
How to Build a Budget 1. Budget guidance is issued
Navy BSO
2. Current/prior fiscal year execution is reviewed 3. Disconnects between guidance and execution are identified 4. Exhibits are prepared and submitted (BSO) 5. Exhibits are reviewed and analyzed; adjustments are recommended (FMB) via Issue Papers 6. Appeals are submitted (BSO) 7. Meetings are held to resolve outstanding issues
Navy FMB
OSD (C)
OMB
Congress
8. Approved budget is submitted to next level Note budgeting is a bottom-up exercise. Planning and programming are top-down. And, this process repeats FOUR times! Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 41
Department of the Navy
41
Concurrent Program & Budget Activities
PR to OSD (ref: 14 Aug 2009) OSD/CAPE PR Issues (Aug 14 – Sep 14) DoD Senior Level Review Group Review (Sep-Oct) DepSecDef Resource Management Decisions (Sep – Dec) BSO Budget submits (6 Jul) FMB review and markup (2 Jul – 12 Aug) SecNav budget decisions (12 Aug)
Budget Estimate Submission to OSD/C (14 Aug) OSD/C review (Aug 14 – Sep 14) DepSecDef decisions – RMDs (Sep – Dec) Develop & submit President’s Budget (Dec 4) President’s Budget Released (Feb 1) APR 10 Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
JUN Slide 42
AUG
NOV
JAN 11 Department of the Navy
42
What’s an “Exhibit”? • Additional detail beyond database numbers • Walks from year to year with explanation • Examples: Appropriation
Exhibit Title
Broken Down To:
MILCON
C-1
BA, State, Base, Project
MILPERS
M-1
Budget Activity and project
O&M
OP-5
BA and AG/SAG
Procurement
P-5
BA and Budget Line Item (BLI)
RDT&E
R-2
BA and Program Element (PE)
• Three key exhibit formats: • Horizontal” (fiscal years from left to right) • “Vertical” (like a checkbook register) • “ Hybrid” (fiscal data at top; written justification below) Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 43
Department of the Navy
43
What Do Budgets Look Like? Let’s look at part of the DoN FY11 O&M Budget (758 pages total)
http://www.finance.hq.navy.mil/fmb/11pres/BOOKS.htm Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 44
Department of the Navy
44
Reading Budget Exhibits: Price Growth vs Program Growth If quantity stays the same but cost changes, that’s PRICE growth. Examples: - Inflation - Foreign currency - Utility rates - Fuel fluctuations - Pay raises If quantity changes, that’s PROGRAM growth. A “horizontal” exhibit example (OP-32) – see handout Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 45
Department of the Navy
45
Reading Budget Exhibits: Price Growth vs Program Growth If quantity stays the same but cost changes, that’s PRICE growth. Examples: - Inflation - Foreign currency - Utility rates - Fuel fluctuations - Pay raises If quantity changes, that’s PROGRAM growth. A “horizontal” exhibit example (OP-32) – see handout Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 46
Department of the Navy
46
Leading Players in the Process Congressional Oversight Committees House of Representatives • Budget Committee (HBC) -- Budget Resolution • Armed Services (HASC) -- Authorization • Appropriations Committee (HAC) -- Appropriations Senate • Budget Committee (SBC) -- Budget Resolution • Armed Services (SASC) -- Authorization • Appropriations Committee (SAC) -- Appropriations
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 48
Department of the Navy
48
Congressional Budget Timeline 4
MAR
FEB
APR
MAY
PB To Hill
House
Concurrent Budget Resolution Senate
JUN 30 JUL
AUG
SEP
1
OCT
NOV
4
FY Begins
House CompletionTarget for FY09 Approps Bills
Markup
HBC Hearings
Floor
Floor
CONF
SBC Hearings
Floor
Floor
Markup House
Defense Authorization Bill
Floor
HASC Hearings
Senate
House
Defense / Milcon Appropriation Bills Senate
Floor Public Law
CONF
SASC Hearings
HAC Hearings
Markup
Floor Floor Floor
Markup Floor CONF
SAC Hearings
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference Note: All timeframes projected/approximate
Markup
Slide 49
Markup
Public Law
Floor Floor Department of the Navy 49
302(b) Allocations (and Appropriations) • • • • • • • • • • • •
Agriculture Commerce, Justice, Science Defense Energy and Water Financial Services Homeland Security Interior Labor, HHS Legislative Branch Military Construction / VA State / Foreign Operations Transportation / HUD
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 50
Department of the Navy
50
Authorization Process (Armed Services Committees) • Defines the scope and content of programs and authorizes their appropriation level • Provides statutory authority to establish or maintain a government program or agency
• Legislative vehicle for Congress to address policy issues and concerns and exert its oversight role • Must have Authorization for: • • • •
Pay Raise End Strength New Start Programs MILCON projects
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 51
Department of the Navy
51
Appropriation Process (Appropriation Committees) • Provides authority to DoD to obligate funds for defense programs • Usually approved at the “account” level, e.g. Combat Training Ranges • Obligation authority usually for a specified period • “Policy” language not permitted
• Bulk of defense funding provided by three appropriations acts • DoD Appropriations • Military Construction Appropriations • Energy and Water Appropriations Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 52
Department of the Navy
52
Types of Appropriations Acts • Regular Appropriations Acts • 12 individual bills • Provides budget/obligation authority for the next FY
• Continuing Resolutions (CR/CRA) • Enacted when 1 or more of the 12 regular bills have not become law by Oct 1 • Provides stop-gap funding at level usually no higher than lowest of levels approved by HAC, SAC or prior fiscal year • Restricts authority to current programs only - no new starts
• Supplemental Appropriations Acts • Provides funds for emergency or unforeseen expenses for current fiscal year Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 53
Department of the Navy
53
Coordination is Key OLA • Liaison for authorization matters
FMBE • Liaison for appropriation matters
DoNPIC • Department of Navy Program Information Center
REMEMBER: • Whenever you deal with Congress or Congressional Staff, ALWAYS adhere to the coordinated DoN, DoD, and Administration position
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 54
Department of the Navy
54
FY10 Budget Execution
POM10 FY10 PB
Planning
Programming
Budgeting Execution
JAN 07
JAN 08
JAN 09
JAN 10
Auth/ Appn Laws CRA Funds Apportioned BSO Execution N82 Midyear Review Supplemental/Omnibus Reprogramming N82 Year-end Reapportionment
SEP 09
DEC 09
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 55
MAR 10
JUN 10
SEP 10 Department of the Navy
55
Three (and ½) Execution Phases: Summary 1
Obligation: Legal encumbrance; Specified amount for purpose or product when an order is placed 1½
2
Expenditure: Authorization for funds from Treasury resulting from presentation of a voucher or claim
3
Outlay: Cash paid by the Treasury
Deobligation: reversal of an obligation due to contract mod, order cancellation, completion of task. etc Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 56
Department of the Navy
56
Three Execution Timeframes Phase Current (1 yr +) Expired (5 yr +)
Cancelled
Oblig.
1
De-Obl.
Expend
2
Outlay
3
X X
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 57
X
X
X Department of the Navy
57
Execution Activities: External Reprogramming
APN
O&MN
• Moving funds from one appropriation to another • Cannot be done without approval of Congress (all 4 committees) • Annual “Omnibus” reprogramming falls into this category • Also some limits prohibiting reprogramming within an appropriation • Difficult way to increase program value Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 58
Department of the Navy
58
Congressional Reprogramming Guidelines Must ask Congress to… • Move funds between any appropriations • Increase any “major procurement” quantity • Affect a Congress Interest Program • Shift > $10M MILPERS • Shift > $15M O&M • Shift > $20M or 20% Procurement • Shift > $10M or 20% RDT&E • Begin any new start > $20M • Terminate procurement ($20M) or RDT&E ($10M)
Must notify Congress to… • • • • •
Begin a new start Shift < $20M Procurement Shift < $10M RDT&E Execute safety mod < $20M Terminate RDT&E < $10M
Via Prior-Approval Reprogramming Request (a.k.a. “Above Threshold Reprogramming”) www.dod.mil/comptroller/execution/Final_Budget_Execution.pdf
All requests are submitted and approved by USD(C) before transmittal to Congress Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 59
Department of the Navy
59
Funds Usage Expectations: Stay Within The Law Public Law says… • 31 USC 1301: Appropriated funds may be used only for the purposes for which the appropriation is made • 31 USC 1517: No officer or employee may authorize an obligation in excess of the amount available in an appropriation or subdivision thereof
In any given year you cannot exceed either the authorized Outlay amount or Total Obligation Authority “fiduciary responsibility” Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 60
Department of the Navy
60
Other Execution Activities: Mid-Year Review • Budget performance is monitored against plans developed during the budget formulation process • Program performance • Obligation and outlay phasing
• O&M accounts required to perform an execution review and submit the results for approval • Realignment of funds made in accordance with urgent “unfunded” requirements • Remaining reserve may be released to help finance approved unfunded requirements
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 61
Department of the Navy
61
Execution Activities: Fiscal Year Closeout • Annual appropriations must be fully obligated by 30 September each year
• 4th quarter intense effort to pull back unobligated funds and reissue to other unfunded requirements • Funds not obligated cannot be restored and any underexecution will cause reductions in the following fiscal year level of available funding • Obligation adjustment can be made during the 5 year expired status
• After that period, adjustments must be financed with an appropriation currently available for the same purpose Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 62
Department of the Navy
62
Joint Process - Combat Commands – Reporting Relationships President of the United States
Secretary of Defense
CJCS JCS Joint Staff
Delegated Oversight Responsibility
Geographic Combatant Commanders USAFRICOM
USJFCOM
USCENTCOM
USSOCOM
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
USEUCOM
USSTRATCOM
Slide 63
USPACOM
USTRANSCOM
USSOUTHCOM
USNORTHCOM
Functional Combatant Commanders
Department of the Navy
63
Different Responsibilities: Warfighters vs Resource Providers Warfighters
Resource Providers
CJCS, JCS, JS, Combatant Commanders (COCOMs)
• Services/Military Departments
Function/Purpose: • Advise President and SecDef on strategic direction of armed forces • Fight and win nation’s wars • Advocate for warfighting (program and resource) requirements to enable that outcome • Submit budget proposals for combatant command activities
• Function/Purpose: • Organize, train, and equip • Prepare and submit budgets • Prepare and provide forces to employ in time of war • Serve as “executive agent” for combatant commands
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 64
Department of the Navy
64
Balancing Competing Objectives: Combatant Commanders and Services
Combatant Command Priority Near term warfighting requirements
Service Priorities Near term readiness Longer-term modernization
• Creates tension in the resource allocation process • Can be healthy • promotes balance between near-term/unconstrained COCOM focus and long-term/constrained Service focus Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 65
Department of the Navy
65
USMC - HQMC Organization Commandant, USMC Counsel for the Commndant Chaplain of the Marine Corps Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps
Marine Corps Systems Command
ACMC Marine Corps National Capital Region Command
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
Director, Safety Division Marine Corps Recruiting Command
DMCS
Marine Barracks Washington, DC
Special Projects Directorate
Dir, Public Affairs
Staff Judge Advocate
Legislative Assistant
Inspector General
Marine Corps Logistics Command
DC, Manpower & Reserve Affairs
DC, Plans, Policies & Operations
DC, Programs & Resources
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
DC, Aviation
Command, Control, Comm & Computers
Slide 66
DC, Installation & Logistics
Dir, Health Services
DC, Combat Development
Dir, Intelligence
Department of the Navy
66
HQMC Organization Commandant CMC
Asst. Commandant ACMC
Programs & Resources
Aviation
Installations & Logistics
Plans, Policy & Operations
Manpower & Reserve Affairs
Command, Control, Comms & Computers
Legislative Assistant
Inspector General
Intelligence
Health Affairs
Public Affairs
Judge Advocate
Admin & Resource Mgmt
Historical
• HQMC/P&R coordinates USMC PPBE • Principal participants build the USMC program
Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 67
Department of the Navy
67
USN and USMC Intersections
P&R Blue Cell
N88
N85
N43 FHP Lead (O-5)
N8 Liaison (O-4)
• Shared Resources: • Blue/Green Split • Jointly predetermined funding ratio between Services
• “BISOG” – Blue in Support of Green • Funds held at USN level that support USMC programs Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 68
Department of the Navy
68
DoN Budget as a Share of DoD TOA TY$B POM08 USMC POM08 DoN POM08 B-G Split POM10 USMC POM10 DoN POM10 B-G Split
~5%
Change
FY10 20.6 124.1 14.2% 27.2 133.3 17.0% + 2.8%
FY11 21.2 127.4 14.3% 28.0 138.1 16.9%
FY12 21.7 130.1 14.3% 28.7 141.6 16.8%
FY13 22.3 132.4 14.4% 28.6 144.3 16.5%
+2.6%
+2.5%
+2.1%
FY14
FY15
29.2 149.7 16.3%
30.0 152.3 16.5%
-
-
* PB 08 Increase experienced from Grow-the-Force
DoD TOA Navy 72%
Marine Corps 17% Navy PPBE Process - HR Conference
Slide 69
Direct 7%
Indirect 4%
Department of the Navy
69